Ex parte WANG - Page 2




          Appeal No. 96-3513                                                          
          Application No. 08/220,772                                                  


               The appellant's invention relates to an output-processing              
          circuit using at least one latch and at least one adder                     
          circuit to produce neural network outputs.  Claim 1 is                      
          illustrative of the claimed invention, and it reads as                      
          follows:                                                                    


                    1.   A processing circuit for processing the                      
               output of an artificial neuron, said neuron                            
               generating a sequence of outputs, said processing                      
               circuit being coupled to said neuron outputs and to                    
               an output gating function, said processing circuit                     
               comprising:                                                            
                    a latch responsive to one of said neuron outputs                  
               and to said output gating function, said latch                         
               generating an output representative of said neuron                     
               output or zero, depending upon the value of said                       
               output gating function; and                                            
                    an adder circuit for generating an output, said                   
               adder circuit being responsive to said latch output                    
               and to its own output.                                                 
               The prior art reference of record relied upon by the                   
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims is:                               
          Krutz et al. (Krutz)          3,707,621           Dec. 26, 1972             
               Claims 1 through 11, 13 through 15, and 17 through 21                  
          stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable                  
          over Krutz.                                                                 

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007