Appeal No. 96-3513
Application No. 08/220,772
claims and therefore has failed to establish a prima facie
case of obviousness. Accordingly, we
cannot sustain the rejection of claims 1 through 11, 13
through 15, and 17 through 21.
CONCLUSION
The decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1 through
11, 13 through 15, and 17 through 21 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is
reversed.
REVERSED
JERRY SMITH )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
ANITA PELLMAN GROSS ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
ERIC FRAHM )
Administrative Patent Judge )
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007