Ex parte HANAOKA et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 96-3561                                                          
          Application No. 08/045,241                                                  


               wherein a shape of the icon changes when the information               
          processing device is operated in each of the operation modes                
          so that an appearance of the icon always corresponds to the                 
          overall appearance of the information processing device.                    

               The examiner relies on the following references:                       
          Hayden                        4,653,090                Mar. 24,             
          1987                                                                        
          Rasmussen et al. (Rasmussen)       4,653,094                Mar.            
          24, 1987                                                                    
          Togawa et al. (Togawa)        5,121,442                Jun.  9,             
          1992                                                                        
          Japanese patent (Shirai)           4-122991                 Apr.            
          23, 1992                                                                    


               Claims 1 through 20 and 35 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.              
          103.  As evidence of obviousness, the examiner offers Hayden                
          with respect to claims 1, 6, 7, 11, 14 through 17, 19 and 20,               
          adding Shirai with respect to claims 8 through 10, 12 and 13.               
          With regard to claim 18, the examiner cites Hayden and Togawa               
          and, with regard to claims 2 through 5 and 35, the examiner                 
          cites Hayden and Rasmussen.                                                 
               We refer to the brief and answer for the respective                    
          positions of appellants and the examiner.                                   



                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007