Ex parte HEACOCK et al. - Page 2




            Appeal No. 96-3577                                                                                
            Application 08/419,064                                                                            


                                               BACKGROUND                                                     

                   The present invention relates to a head mounted display system for viewing the             
            displayed images/text using both eyes, but using a single display.  The system uses a             
            binocular optical system for both the right and the left eyes where the optical centerline        
            paths for each eye are angled towards the single virtual image perceived by the user of the       
            system.  Multiple embodiments of the system are claimed emphasizing different aspects of          
            the invention.  A second embodiment is directed to a structural relationship between the          
            display, optics and a keyboard.                                                                   
                   Appellants have indicated that the claims do not stand or fall together and have           
                                                                                           4                  
            provided separate arguments to the varied embodiments in the claims.   (See brief  at             
            pages 13-14.)                                                                                     
                   Independent claim 1 is representative of a first embodiment of the invention and           
            reproduced as follows:                                                                            
                   1.  A head mounted display system comprising a support to mount the display                
                   system on a user's head;                                                                   
                         a single display mounted on said support for displaying video                        
                         information;                                                                         


            allowable if rewritten into independent form.                                                     
                   4Appellants filed a supplemental appeal brief, February 10, 1999, (Paper No. 19) to supplement
            the non-compliant appeal brief filed December 18, 1995, (Paper No. 12).  We will refer to the arguments in
            the original appeal brief as simply the brief.  Appellants filed a reply brief on June 24, 1996, (Paper No. 14).
            We will simply refer to this as the reply.                                                        
                                                      2                                                       





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007