Appeal No. 96-3618 Application 08/004,598 We generally adopt the Examiner's reasons, but note that the "telephone instrument" at "a third location" is better read on the telephones known to be attached to the landlines of the telephone company phone system (TELCO) in Gillig, but not expressly shown in figure 1, rather than on the community cordless base station 188 as found by the Examiner (EA31). In Gillig, the TELCO corresponds to the claimed "public telephone system" (shown as the central telephone exchange CTE in Appellant's figure 17). The cordless base station 180 and antenna 182 in home or office 181 correspond to the claimed "first transceiver and a first antenna" at "a first location" (shown as the dual function base transmitter station DFBSz at location Z in Appellant's figure 17). The cellular base station 190 and antennas 192, 194 correspond to the claimed "second transceiver and a second antenna" at "a second location" (shown as the cellular base station CBSy and cellular antenna CAy in Appellant's figure 17). The TELCO is known to those of ordinary skill in the art (indeed, to an average person) to have other telephones attached to the system than the ones shown in figure 1 of Gillig, which telephones correspond to the claimed "telephone instrument" at - 15 -Page: Previous 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007