Appeal No. 96-3618
Application 08/004,598
11. Claim 69 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over Crane and Hong (new ground of
rejection in 2dSEA).
12. Claim 7 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Gillig and Bartholomew (new ground of
rejection in EA).
13. Claims 58-60 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over Gillig and Hong (new ground of
rejection in EA).
14. Claim 27 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over Gillig, Sakanishi, and Stoodley (new
ground of rejection in EA).
15. Claims 30, 46, and 61 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) as being unpatentable over Gillig and Yorita (new
ground of rejection in EA).
16. Claims 43-45 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over Gillig and Gilhousen (new ground of
rejection in EA).
- 8 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007