Appeal No. 96-3618
Application 08/004,598
5. Claims 66-68 and 70-77 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 102(e) as being anticipated by Crane (new ground of
rejection in 2dSEA).
6. Claims 1, 5, and 46 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) as being unpatentable over Gillig and Fujii (new
ground of rejection in 2dSEA).
7. Claim 7 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Gillig and Yorita (new ground of rejection
in 2dSEA).
8. Claims 27 and 28 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)
as being unpatentable over Gillig and Duffy (new ground of
rejection in 2dSEA).
9. Claim 47 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over Gillig, Fujii, and Duffy (new ground
of rejection in 2dSEA).
10. Claim 58 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over Hong and either Kinoshita or Gillig
(new ground of rejection in 2dSEA).
- 7 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007