THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 17 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte FILIP J. YESKEL _____________ Appeal No. 96-3635 Application 08/209,0961 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before URYNOWICZ, JERRY SMITH and CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent Judges. URYNOWICZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 1, 4, 5, 9 and 13-15, all the claims pending in the application. The invention pertains to a document image processing method. Claim 1 is illustrative and 1Application for patent filed March 10, 1994. 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007