Ex parte YESKEL - Page 9




                Appeal No. 96-3635                                                                                                       
                Application 08/209,096                                                                                                   


                data is being generated.  Dinan does not discuss                                                                         





                continuing document transport even though unacceptable quality image data is being generated.  A prior                   

                art reference that teaches away from the claimed invention is a significant factor to be considered in                   

                determining obviousness.  In re Gurley, 27 F.3d 551, 553, 31 USPQ2d 1130, 1132  (Fed. Cir. 1994).                        

                        Whereas the rejection of independent claims 1 and 9 will not be sustained, the rejection of                      

                dependent claims will also not be sustained.                                                                             

                                                            REVERSED                                                                     





                                STANLEY M. URYNOWICZ, JR                        )                                                        
                               Administrative Patent Judge                     )                                                        
                                                                                )                                                        
                                                                                )                                                        
                                                                                )                                                        
                                JERRY SMITH                                     ) BOARD OF PATENT                                        
                                Administrative Patent Judge                     )                                                        
                                                                                )   APPEALS AND                                          
                                                                                )                                                        
                                                                                ) INTERFERENCES                                          
                                JAMES T. CARMICHAEL                             )                                                        
                                Administrative Patent Judge                     )                                                        



                                                                   9                                                                     





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007