THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a
law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte WILLIAM M. SCHWARZ, Jr.
__________
Appeal No. 96-3689
Application 08/325,9141
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before WEIFFENBACH, ELLIS and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
WEIFFENBACH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final rejection of claims
1-27. The remaining claims in the application, claims 28-38, have been withdrawn from consideration
pursuant to a restriction requirement. We have carefully considered the respective positions advanced by
appellant and the examiner. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse the examiner's rejection.
Application for patent filed October 19, 1994.1
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007