THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte CHARLES M. HATTON
_____________
Appeal No. 96-3699
Application 08/063,4071
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before URYNOWICZ, THOMAS and HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judges.
URYNOWICZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 1-6, 8 and 9, all the claims pending in the
application.
The invention pertains to a method of using digitally stored information to create ideas and solve
1Application for patent filed May 18, 1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007