Ex parte HATTON - Page 2




                Appeal No. 96-3699                                                                                                       
                Application 08/063,407                                                                                                   


                problems.  Claim 1 is illustrative and reads as follows:                                                                 



                        1.  A method of using digitally stored information to create ideas and solve problems,                           
                comprising the steps of:                                                                                                 

                        (a) receiving an input statement identifies a problem to be solved;                                              

                        (b) identifying at least one word in said input statement, said at least one word being an object                
                of a verb, the action of said verb occurring upon solution of said problem;                                              

                        (c) receiving a first data base that contains information relating to a first system and that relates            
                to said problem to be solved;                                                                                            

                        (d) receiving a second data base that contains information relating to a second system;                          

                        (e) locating an entry in said first data base that corresponds to said object;                                   

                        (f) determining the hierarchical level of said entry in said first data base;                                    

                        (g) obtaining data relating to a process from said second data base at said hierarchical level in                
                said second data base; and                                                                                               

                        (h) substituting said object for at least one word in said process data.                                         
                                                                                                                                        
                        The references relied upon by the examiner as evidence of obviousness are:                                       

                Bourne                                  4,787,035                       Nov. 22, 1988                                    
                Prager                                  5,255,386                       Oct.  19, 1993                                   
                                                                               (filed Feb. 08, 1990)                                    

                        The appealed claims stand rejected as under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over                           

                Prager in view of Bourne.                                                                                                


                                                                   2                                                                     





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007