Ex parte AHARON et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 96-3762                                                          
          Application No. 08/245,179                                                  


               The appellants' invention relates to a generator of test               
          programs for checking the operation of a hardware processor                 
          design.  Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and              
          it reads as follows:                                                        
               1.  A test program generator for producing test programs               
          for checking the operation of a hardware processor design,                  
          said test program generator comprising:                                     
               storing means for storing data representing a processor                
          instruction set and resources, said stored data being                       
          represented as a separate declarative specification, said                   
          separate declarative specification being a representation of                
          relationships between semantic entities associated with each                
          instruction and between said semantic entities and said                     
          processor resources;                                                        
               extracting means for extracting said data from said                    
          storage means and for transforming said data into internal                  
          data structures; and                                                        
               test program generating means for generating test                      
          programs from said internal data structures.                                
               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Highland                    4,924,408               May  08, 1990           
          Loopik et al. (Loopik)      5,381,417               Jan. 10, 1995           
                                                      (filed Aug. 19, 1988)           
               Claims 1 through 15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103               
          as being unpatentable over Loopik in view of Highland.                      
               Reference is made to the examiner's answer (Paper No. 11,              
          mailed May 29, 1996) for the examiner's complete reasoning in               
                                         -2-                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007