THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not
written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte PHILIP A. CONGDON, LILY Y. PANG, and GARY A. EVANS
____________
Appeal No. 96-3813
Application No. 08/248,9371
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before JERRY SMITH, BARRETT, and GROSS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1, 3, and 11 through 23. Claims 4 through
10 have been withdrawn from consideration as being directed to
nonelected claims. An amendment filed concurrently with the
reply brief has been approved for entry by the examiner.
1Application for patent filed May 25, 1994.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007