Ex parte CONGDON et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 96-3813                                                          
          Application No. 08/248,937                                                  


               The appellants' invention relates to an optical coupler                
          between a semiconductor waveguide and a dielectric waveguide.               
               Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it               
          reads as follows:                                                           
               1. A coupler between a semiconductor waveguide and a                   
          dielectric waveguide, comprising:                                           
               (a) a grating between a rectangular semiconductor                      
          waveguide and a dielectric waveguide with a roughly square                  
          core, wherein said grating has a mechanical wave vector equal               
          to the difference between a propagation vector of said                      
          semiconductor waveguide and a propagation vector of said                    
          dielectric waveguide.                                                       
               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Fukushima et al. (Fukushima)            5,070,488           Dec.            
          03, 1991                                                                    
          Laybourn et al. (Laybourn)         GB 1535171     Dec. 06, 1978             
          Nobuhara                           JP 3-2630102   Nov. 22, 1991             
               Claims 1, 3, and 11 through 23 stand rejected under 35                 
          U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Laybourn in view of                 
          Nobuhara, and further in view of Fukushima for claims 12, 13,               
          17, 18, 22, and 23.                                                         



               Our understanding of this reference is based upon a translation2                                                                     
          provided by the Scientific and Technical Information Center of the Patent and
          Trademark Office.  A copy of the translation is enclosed with this decision.
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007