THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte LOREN A. HALUSKA
____________
Appeal No. 1996-3816
Application No. 08/293,3311
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, PAK, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent
Judges.
KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 54 through 56. Claims 57-60, which are
1Application for patent filed August 22, 1994. According
to appellant, this application is a division of Application
No. 08/077,469, filed June 15, 1993; which is a continuation
of Application No. 07/683,908, filed April 11, 1991, now
abandoned; which is a continuation of Application No.
07/423,317, filed October 18, 1989, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007