THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not
written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ERIC W. SCHIEVE
____________
Appeal No. 96-3850
Application No. 08/253,4801
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON, and GROSS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 through 12, which are all of the claims
pending in this application.
The appellant's invention relates to a system for testing
hardware interrupt service routines for a microprocessor prior
Application for patent filed June 3, 1994.1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007