Appeal No. 96-3850
Application No. 08/253,480
As to the method claims, independent claim 7 requires
loading with interrupt vectors a read/writable memory formed
on the same semiconductor chip as the microprocessor. As
discussed above, the prior art falls short of teaching forming
the particular read/writable memory with the interrupt vectors
on the same semiconductor chip as the microprocessor.
Accordingly, we cannot sustain the rejection.
CONCLUSION
The decision of the examiner to reject claims 1 through
12 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.
REVERSED
JAMES D. THOMAS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
KENNETH W. HAIRSTON ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
ANITA PELLMAN GROSS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007