Ex parte BEYER et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 96-3889                                                          
          Application 08/336,956                                                      



          ers may flow from said body portion to said collection por-                 
          tion;                                                                       
                    raised source and drain contact members capped with               
          a cap dielectric having a cap top surface above said gate top               
          surface;                                                                    
                    a collection electrode doped with said second polar-              
          ity and disposed in contact with said silicon layer on a                    
          collection side of said gate extension opposite said gate,                  
          whereby minority carriers may flow from said body through said              
          collection portion of said silicon layer to said collection                 
          electrode, said gate extension having gate sidewall support                 
          members connected to said gate and disposed between said                    
          collection electrode and said source and drain, said collec-                
          tion electrode being isolated from said gate and from said                  
          raised source and drain contact members by at least one insu-               
          lating sidewall.                                                            


                    The reference relied on by the Examiner is as fol-                
          lows:                                                                       
          Yamaguchi et al. (Yamaguchi)      5,355,012      Oct. 11, 1994              
          (filed Apr. 28,                                                             
          1993)                                                                       

                    Claim 11 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as                 
          being anticipated by Yamaguchi.                                             
                    Rather than repeat the arguments of Appellants or                 
          the                                                                         
          Examiner, we make reference to the brief and the answer for                 
          the details thereof.                                                        
                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007