THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 24
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte YING-YUH LU, MICHAEL D. CRANDALL and ROBERT D. KOPPES
_____________
Appeal No. 96-3933
Application 07/829,8991
______________
HEARD: July 12, 1999
_______________
Before KIMLIN, GARRIS and WARREN, Administrative Patent Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-11. Claims 12-26, the other
claims remaining in the present application, stand withdrawn from consideration. Claim 1
is illustrative:
1Application for patent filed February 3, 1992.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007