Appeal No. 96-3933
Application 07/829,899
As a final point, we note that appellants base no argument upon either objective
evidence of nonobviousness or comparative data between latexes within the scope of the
appealed claims and those fairly taught by Frazee.
In conclusion, based on the foregoing, and the reasons well-stated by the examiner,
the examiner's decision rejecting the appealed claims is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may
be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
EDWARD C. KIMLIN )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
BRADLEY R. GARRIS ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
CHARLES F. WARREN )
Administrative Patent Judge )
vsh
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007