Ex parte ZIOLO et al. - Page 1






                                             THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                                              
                                                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                                                                            
                     (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                                                                                                          
                     (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                 Paper No. 15                                          

                                               UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                                               
                                                                              _______________                                                                                          

                                                       BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                                              
                                                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                                                             
                                                                              _______________                                                                                          

                                                                     Ex parte GERALD F. ZIOLO                                                                                          
                                                                and KATHLEEN M. BRAUNGART                                                                                              
                                                                              ______________                                                                                           

                                                                           Appeal No. 1996-3980                                                                                        
                                                                         Application 08/290,1251                                                                                       
                                                                              _______________                                                                                          

                                                                                   ON BRIEF                                                                                            
                                                                              _______________                                                                                          

                     Before KIMLIN, JOHN D. SMITH and WARREN, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                                            

                     WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                                              
                                                                             Decision on Appeal                                                                                        
                                This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the decision of the examiner finally rejecting                                                            
                     claims 1 through 9, 11, 20 through 22 and 24 through 27.  Claims 10, 12 through 19, 23 and 28 are                                                                 
                     also of record and have been withdrawn from consideration by the examiner under 37 CFR § 1.142(b)                                                                 
                     (1959).  Claim 1 is illustrative of the claims on appeal:                                                                                                         
                                1.  A magnetic nanocomposite composition comprising from about 0.001 to about 60 weight                                                                
                     percent of nanocrystalline particles of Fe O , and from about 40 to about 99.999 weight percent of a                                                              
                                                                               3   4                                                                                                   

                     1Application for patent filed August 15, 1994.                                                                                                                    
                                                                                   - 1 -                                                                                               




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007