THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 8
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte PAUL M. FROMM
_____________
Appeal No. 96-3992
Application 08/356,6181
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before JERRY SMITH, BARRETT, and RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judges.
RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 1, 5, and 9-14 . Claims 3, 2
4, 7, and 8 have been indicated as containing allowable subject matter. Claims 2 and 6 have been
1Application for patent filed December 15, 1994.
2Claim 10 is included in this appeal although it does not appear in the reproduction of the
claims on appeal in the Appendix at page 9 of the Brief.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007