THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 24
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte BURHAM BAYRAKTAROGLU
__________
Appeal No. 1996-4082
Application 08/179,2381
___________
HEARD: October 18, 1999
___________
Before KRASS, BARRETT and FRAHM, Administrative Patent Judges.
FRAHM, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellant has appealed to the Board from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 to 12 and
1Application for patent filed January 10, 1994. According to appellant, the application is a divisional of
Application 07/649,378, filed January 31, 1991, now U.S. Patent No. 5,283,448, issued February 1, 1994..
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007