THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 13
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte WILLIAM M. HEYN,
ROBERT W. FRASER
and DONALD J. ROTH
____________
Appeal No. 96-4165
Application No. 08/333,2921
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, PAK, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent
Judges.
KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed November 1, 1994.
According to appellants, this application is a division of
Application 08/174,059, filed December 28, 1993, now U.S.
Patent No. 5,360,588, issued November 1, 1994, which is a
division of Application No. 07/764,546, filed September 24,
1991, now U.S. Patent No. 5,273,416, issued December 28, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007