Ex parte BOND et al. - Page 9




          Appeal No. 96-4180                                                          
          Application No. 08/225,138                                                  


          not make the modification obvious unless the prior art                      
          suggested the desirability of the modification."  In re                     
          Fritch, 972 F.2d 1260, 1266 n.14, 23 USPQ2d 1780, 1783-84 n.14              
          (Fed. Cir. 1992), citing In re Gordon, 733 F.2d 900, 902, 221               
          USPQ 1125, 1127 (Fed. Cir. 1984).  "Obviousness may not be                  
          established using hindsight or in view of the teachings or                  
          suggestions of the inventor."  Para-Ordnance Mfg., 73 F.3d at               
          1087, 37 USPQ2d at 1239, citing                                             
          W. L. Gore, 721 F.2d at 1551, 1553, 220 USPQ at 311, 312-13.                





















                                          9                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007