THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte SHUICHI KIKUCHI
____________
Appeal No. 96-4193
Application No. 08/267,0491
____________
HEARD: June 8, 1999
____________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, WALTZ and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the examiner’s refusal to allow
claims 1 through 4 as amended after the final rejection (see
the amendment dated Sept. 7, 1995, Paper No. 8, entered as per
the Advisory Action dated Sept. 29, 1995, Paper No. 9).
1Application for patent filed June 28, 1994.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007