THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte ORVILLE D. MEANS, ROBERT W. LECLAIR,
and DAVID S. FURUNO
__________
Appeal No. 96-4194
Application 08/239,7321
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before HAIRSTON, BARRETT and RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1
through 5, 7 through 12 and 14 through 19. In an Amendment
1Application for patent filed May 9, 1994. According to
the appellants, the application is a continuation-in-part of
Application 07/959,700, filed October 13, 1992, now U.S.
Patent 5,311,023, issued May 10, 1994.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007