THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte JOHN D. LA LONDE,
CRAIG A. MAC DONNELL,
and DAVID CUCUZELLA
_____________
Appeal No. 97-0055
Application 08/430,1111
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before HAIRSTON, FLEMING and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 22 through 40.
The disclosed invention relates to a computerized method of producing instructions for
1Application for patent filed April 27, 1995. According to appellants, this application is a
continuation of Application 08/179,639, filed January 10, 1994.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007