THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 32
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte PAUL G. SWISZCZ and WENDELL B. COLSON
____________
Appeal No. 97-0056
Application No. 07/791,1561
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before STAAB, CRAWFORD, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 57 through 60, which are all of the claims
pending in this application.2
1Application for patent filed November 13, 1991.
2Claims 9, 10 and 18 through 40 were canceled in Paper No.
14, filed January 13, 1994. Claims 1 and 41 were canceled in
Paper No. 19, filed December 23, 1994. Claims 2 through 8, 11
through 17, 42 through 56, 61 and 62 were canceled in the
amendment after final rejection filed June 9, 1995, the entry
of which is acknowledged on page 1 of the examiner's answer.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007