Ex Parte HESS et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 97-0064                                                          
          Application No. 08/286,785                                                  


          concerning the pill and also a method and device for retrieving             
          the information from the micro barcode. 2  Claims 1 and 5 are               
          illustrative of the claimed invention, and they read as follows:            
               1.   A pill on which is imprinted micro barcode, said micro            
          barcode containing information pertaining to any one of                     
          medication contents of the pill and source identification of the            
          pill.                                                                       
               5.   A device for retrieving information encoded on a micro            
          barcode imprinted on a pill and indicating the retrieved                    
          information to a user, comprising:                                          
               means for scanning the micro barcode on the pill to retrieve           
          information encoded in the micro barcode;                                   
               means for interpreting the scanned micro barcode; and                  
               means responsive to results of interpretation by said                  
          interpreting means for indicating information encoded in the                
          micro barcode in a manner understandable to the user.                       
               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Wittwer                  4,478,658                  Oct. 23, 1984           
          Shamir                   5,118,369                  Jun. 02, 1992           
          Aurenius3                5,129,974                  Jul. 14, 1992           
               Claims 1 through 16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as            
          being unpatentable over Wittwer in view of Shamir or Aurenius.              
               Reference is made to the Examiner's Answer (Paper No. 15,              
          mailed June 27, 1996) for the examiner's complete reasoning in              

               2 Appellants may find U.S. Patent 5,700,998 to Palti to be             
          of interest.                                                                
               3 Since the disclosures of Shamir and Aurenius are virtually           
          the same, only Shamir will be discussed in this opinion.                    
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007