Ex parte TSAY - Page 1




                                  THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                          

                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law                 
                journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                                  

                                                                                                Paper No.27                             


                                   UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                            

                                                             __________                                                                 

                                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                             
                                                      AND INTERFERENCES                                                                 
                                                             __________                                                                 

                                                   Ex parte CHING-YUH TSAY                                                              
                                                             __________                                                                 

                                                       Appeal No. 1997-0179                                                             
                                                      Application 08/251,0541                                                           
                                                            ___________                                                                 

                                                              ON BRIEF                                                                  
                                                            ___________                                                                 

                Before KRASS, BARRETT and FRAHM, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                          

                FRAHM, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                     

                                                      DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                

                        Appellant has appealed to the Board from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 to 8, which                 

                constitute all of the pending claims in the application before us on appeal.                                            

                                                          BACKGROUND                                                                    

                        The subject matter on appeal is directed to the field of integrated circuits, and in particular, to a           

                        Application for patent filed May 31, 1994.1                                                                                                              
                                                                   1                                                                    





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007