THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No.27 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte CHING-YUH TSAY __________ Appeal No. 1997-0179 Application 08/251,0541 ___________ ON BRIEF ___________ Before KRASS, BARRETT and FRAHM, Administrative Patent Judges. FRAHM, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Appellant has appealed to the Board from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 to 8, which constitute all of the pending claims in the application before us on appeal. BACKGROUND The subject matter on appeal is directed to the field of integrated circuits, and in particular, to a Application for patent filed May 31, 1994.1 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007