Ex parte TSAY - Page 3




                Appeal No. 1997-0179                                                                                                    
                Application 08/251,054                                                                                                  







                        Representative claim 1 is reproduced below:                                                                     

                        1.  A memory device for producing a burn-in reference voltage, comprising:                                      

                        an input circuit for receiving an internal reference voltage and an external reference voltage;                 

                        a feedback circuit coupled to said input circuit to produce a feedback voltage having deviations                
                from said internal reference voltage, said feedback circuit being responsive to said deviations of said                 
                feedback voltage to adjust said feedback voltage toward said internal reference voltage as said                         
                feedback voltage is measured with respect to said internal reference voltage;                                           

                        a mirroring circuit coupled to said feedback circuit and said input circuit to produce said burn-in             
                reference voltage by receiving said feedback voltage and mirroring said feedback voltage to produce a                   
                mirrored voltage having a magnitude approximately the same as said feedback voltage, said mirrored                      
                voltage being measured with respect to said external reference voltage.                                                 
                        The following reference is relied on by the examiner:                                                           

                Fischer                                 5,300,837                               Apr. 5, 1994                            
                                                                                        (filed Sept. 17, 1992)                          

                        Claims 1 to 8 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, as being indefinite for                   

                failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter regarded as the invention (see                

                Answer, page 3).                                                                                                        

                        The rejection of claims 1 to 8 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Rybicki has                     

                been withdrawn.2                                                                                                        


                        2The Answer states that the rejection of claims 1 to 8 as being anticipated by Rybicki "has been withdrawn      
                by the examiner" (Answer, page 2).                                                                                      
                                                                   3                                                                    





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007