Appeal No. 1997-0197
Application No. 08/195,676
forming an image with the selected resolution setting;
storing said image in said memory means; and displaying at
least the selected resolution setting and the number of images
that can be further stored in said memory means for the
selected resolution setting.
The Examiner relies on the following prior art:
Sakata et al. (Sakata) 5,105,284 Apr. 14,
1992
Sakai et al. (Sakai) 5,285,290 Feb. 08,
1994
Claims 1, 3-7, and 9-12 stand finally rejected under 35
U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Sakai in view of
Sakata.
Rather than reiterate the arguments of Appellants and the
Examiner, reference is made to the Briefs and Answer for the 2
respective details thereof.
OPINION
We have carefully considered the subject matter on
appeal, the rejection advanced by the Examiner and the
evidence
2The Appeal Brief was filed March 4, 1996. In response
to the Examiner’s Answer dated May 21, 1996, a Reply Brief was
filed July 22, 1996 which was acknowledged and entered by the
Examiner without further comment on August 7, 1996.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007