THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2)
is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ANDRZEJ WASILEWSKI, MAURYCY KOCISZEWSKI,
JAROSLAW KOCISZEWSKI and RONALD BROOKES
____________
Appeal No. 1997-0202
Application No. 08/247,7091
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before KRASS, FLEMING and RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judges.
RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of
claims 2-5, 9, 11, 12, 16, 17, 35, and 39. Claims 1, 6-8, 10,
13, 14, 27-34, 37, and 38 have been canceled. Claims 19-26 and
36 are allowed. Claims 15 and 18 have been indicated by the
Examiner as containing allowable subject matter but are objected
to as being dependent on a rejected claim. An amendment after
1 Application for patent filed May 23, 1994.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007