THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JEFFREY D. GELORME, MARTIN J. GOLDBERG,
NANCY C. LABIANCA and JANE M. SHAW
____________
Appeal No. 97-0226
Application No. 08/441,9651
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before PAK, WALTZ, and ROBINSON, Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Gelorme et al. (appellants) appeal from the examiner’s
final rejection of claims 9 through 11 and 16 through 19.
Claims 22 through 25 stand withdrawn from consideration by the
examiner as being directed to a nonelected invention.
1Application for patent filed May 16, 1995. According to
appellants, the application is a division of Application No.
08/357,789, filed December 16, 1994; which is a continuation
of Application No. 08/122,886, filed July 13, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007