THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte NEVILLE S. BATLIWALLA and
JAMES C. THOMPSON
____________
Appeal No. 1997-0236
Application No. 08/211,8291
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before URYNOWICZ, BARRETT, and RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent
Judges.
RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of
claims 1-20. An amendment after final rejection which
1Application for patent filed November 6, 1992.
According to appellants, this application is a 371 of
PCT/US91/03123, filed May 7, 1991.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007