Appeal No. 1997-0236
Application No. 08/211,829
Johannsen would inherently pass a flame test, no support for
such position is forthcoming from the Examiner other than the
bald assertions mentioned above.
For all of the reasons discussed above, we are of the
view that the Examiner has not established a prima facie case
of obviousness and, therefore, do not sustain the 35 U.S.C. §
103 rejection of any of the claims on appeal. Accordingly,
the Examiner’s decision rejecting claims 1-16 and 18-20 is
reversed.
REVERSED
STANLEY M. URYNOWICZ JR. )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
LEE E. BARRETT ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007