THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte EISUKE TOMITA and NAGOTO MORIYA
__________
Appeal No. 1997-0252
Application 08/200,8201
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before JERRY SMITH, LALL, and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges.
JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final
rejection of claims 7-28, which constitute all the claims in the application. Three
amendments after final rejection were filed, and each of these amendments was entered
1Application for patent filed February 23, 1994.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007