Ex parte TOMITA et al. - Page 2




              Appeal No. 1997-0252                                                                                      
              Application 08/200,820                                                                                    



              by the examiner.  These amendments resulted in an indication of the allowability of claims                
              16-21 and 23.  Accordingly, this appeal is directed to the rejection of claims 7-15, 22 and               
              24-28.                                                                                                    
              The disclosed invention pertains to a magnetic force sensor for detecting                                 
              magnetization on a surface.  More particularly, the tip portion of a probe is coated with a               
              hard-magnetic material which maintains the magnetization direction of the probe constant                  
              and parallel to the magnetization on the surface.  The probe scans the surface and is                     
              deflected as a function of the direction of the magnetization on the surface.                             
              Representative claim 7 is reproduced as follows:                                                          
                     7.  A magnetic force sensor for detecting a magnetic force of a magnetic sample                    
              having a given magnetization direction, the magnetic force sensor comprising: a magnetic                  
              probe having a tip portion, the tip portion being coated with a film of hard-magnetic                     
              material effective to maintain the magnetization direction of the probe constant and parallel             
              to the given magnetization direction of the sample.                                                       

              The examiner relies on the following reference:                                                           
              Clabes et al. (Clabes)        5,171,992          Dec. 15, 1992                                            

              Claims 7-15, 22 and 24-28 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103.  As evidence of                           
              obviousness the examiner offers Clabes taken alone.                                                       
              Rather than repeat the arguments of appellants or the examiner, we make reference                         
              to the briefs and the answer for the respective details thereof.                                          

                                                           2                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007