Appeal No. 97-0260
Application 08/287,477
Oliver does not cure the deficiencies noted while discussing
said rejection of claim 18, therefore, the rejection of claim
20 over Lewis, Janz and Oliver is also not sustained.
In summary, we have sustained under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 the rejection of claims 1 to 3, 8 to 10, 15 and 16 over
Lewis and Janz; of claims 13 and 14 over Lewis, Janz and
Sidman and of claim 17 over Lewis, Janz and Oliver, while we
have not sustained the rejection of claims 11, 12, 18, 19 and
28 over Lewis and Janz, and of claim 20 over Lewis, Janz and
Oliver. Accordingly, the decision of the Examiner rejecting
claims 1 through 3, 8 through 20 and 28 under 35 U.S.C. § 103
is affirmed in part.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
-15-
Page: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007