THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 29
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte YOICHI SEKI, HIROYUKI SAITO,
and TERUYO HAYAKAWA
_____________
Appeal No. 1997-0318
Application 08/135,1731
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before FLEMING, RUGGIERO and LALL, Administrative Patent Judges.
LALL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through 18, which constitute all the claims2
1Application for patent filed October 12, 1993.
2An amendment after the final rejection was filed [paper no. 10], however, it was refused entry
[paper no. 11]. A second amendment after the final rejection was filed [paper no. 14] and was entered
in the record by the Examiner [paper no. 15].
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007