THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 28
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JUN NAKAMURA
____________
Appeal No. 1997-0373
Application No. 08/151,6941
____________
HEARD: July 14, 1999
____________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, COHEN and
NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 12 to 15, 17, 21 to 25 and 27. Claim 19 2
has been allowed. Claims 16 and 26 have been objected to as
1Application for patent filed November 15, 1993.
2Claims 13, 17, 21 to 23 and 27 have been amended
subsequent to the final rejection (Paper No. 5, mailed April
17, 1995.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007