THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte RONALD W. HOLLING, PATRICK J. GLOTZBACH
and JEROME D. HUENER
__________
Appeal No. 97-0391
Application 08/443,0441
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before HAIRSTON, BARRETT, and LALL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
LALL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the Examiner's final rejection of Claims 1 to 12. Claims 6, 8
and 9 were canceled in an amendment after the final rejection,
1Application for patent filed May 17, 1995. According to
the appellant, the application is a continuation of
Application 08/042,439, filed April 5, 1993, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007