Ex parte HOLLING et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)              
          was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is                 
          not binding precedent of the Board.                                         
                                                            Paper No. 23              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                     __________                                       
                  Ex parte RONALD W. HOLLING, PATRICK J. GLOTZBACH                    
                                and JEROME D. HUENER                                  
                                     __________                                       
                                 Appeal No. 97-0391                                   
                               Application 08/443,0441                                
                                     ___________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     ___________                                      

          Before HAIRSTON, BARRETT, and LALL, Administrative Patent                   
          Judges.                                                                     
          LALL, Administrative Patent Judge.                                          

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from                
          the Examiner's final rejection of Claims 1 to 12.  Claims 6, 8              
          and 9 were canceled in an amendment after the final rejection,              

               1Application for patent filed May 17, 1995.  According to              
          the appellant, the application is a continuation of                         
          Application 08/042,439, filed April 5, 1993, now abandoned.                 
                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007