Ex parte HOLLING et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 97-0391                                                          
          Application 08/443,044                                                      


               warning means operatively connected to said sensor means               
          whereby, in the event said sensor means senses said predefined              
          environmental condition, said warning means generates a                     
          warning signal.                                                             
                                                                                     


               The Examiner relies on the following references:                       
                              U.S. Patents                                            
          Durst et al. al. (Durst)           4,977,404           Dec. 11,             
          1990                                                                        
          Doyle et al. al. (Doyle)           5,402,105           Mar. 28,             
          1995                                                                        
                              Foreign Patents                                         
          Zinkann                            3,437,398           Apr. 17,             
          1986                                                                        
          (Translation of German Offenlegungsschrift)                                 
          Malik                         WO 90/14,563   Nov. 29, 1990                  
               Claims 1, 4, 7 and 10 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §                 
          102 as being anticipated by Zinkann.  Claims 1, 2, 4, 7 and 10              
          stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as being anticipated by                
          Malik.  Claims 3 and 5 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as              
          being obvious over Malik and Durst, while claims 11 and 12                  
          stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being obvious over                  
          Malik, Durst and Doyle.                                                     


                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007