THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not
written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 36
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte BERNARD O. GEAGHAN
____________
Appeal No. 97-0412
Application No. 08/434,5581
____________
HEARD: November 4, 1999
____________
Before JERRY SMITH, LALL, and GROSS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 18, 20, 21, and 28. Claims 1 through 17,
1Application for patent filed May 4, 1995. According to
appellant, this is a continuation of Application No.
08/031,614, filed March 15, 1993, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007