Ex parte GEAGHAN - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1997-0412                                                        
          Application No. 08/434,558                                                  


          22, 23, and 27 have been withdrawn from consideration.  Claims              
          19, 24 through 26, 29, and 30 have been canceled.                           
               Appellant's invention relates to a system for sensing the              
          position of a stylus and generating a display.  Claim 18 is                 
          illustrative of the claimed invention, and it reads as                      
          follows:                                                                    
               18. A system for sensing the position of a stylus                      
          proximate a display device employing a matrix of display                    
          electrodes which generate display electrode signals, wherein                
          the position sensing and display functions are performed                    
          simultaneously, comprising:                                                 
               means for generating in the stylus positioning signals;                
               means for coupling said positioning signals to the                     
          display electrodes and for superimposing said positioning                   
          signals onto the display electrode signals;                                 
               means for sensing said positioning signals from the                    
          display electrodes; and                                                     
               means, responsive to said means for sensing, for                       
          resolving the position of the stylus in relation to the                     
          display electrodes.                                                         
               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Togashi et al. (Togashi)           4,345,248        Aug. 17, 1982           
          Piliavin et al. (Piliavin)         4,363,029        Dec. 07, 1982           
          Rympalski et al. (Rympalski)       4,639,720        Jan. 27, 1987           
          More et al. (More)                 4,839,634        Jun. 13, 1989           
               Claims 18, 20, 21, and 28 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.               
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007