Appeal No. 1997-0509
Application 08/314,131
each of the memory blocks in accordance with a plurality of
predetermined user applications, and for storing printing data
corresponding to the respective predetermined user
applications to the respective memory blocks.
The Examiner relies on the following reference:
Toyokura 5,335,316 Aug. 2, 1994
(filed Apr. 22, 1992)
Claims 5 to 19 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as
being
anticipated by Toyokura.
Rather than repeat the arguments of Appellant or the
Examiner, we make reference to the briefs and the answer for 3
the respective details thereof.
OPINION
We have considered the rejections advanced by the
Examiner and the supporting arguments. We have, likewise,
reviewed Appellant’s arguments set forth in the briefs. It is
our view that claims 5 to 19 are anticipated by Toyokura.
In our analysis, we are guided by the precedence of our
reviewing court that the limitations from the disclosure are
not to be imported into the claims. In re Lundberg, 244 F.2d
3A reply brief was filed [paper no. 14] and was entered
in the record without any further response by the Examiner
[paper no. 15].
-3-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007