Appeal No. 1997-0509
Application 08/314,131
add nothing further. Furthermore, once again, dependent
claims 17 through 19 are elected to be grouped with claim 16
[brief, page 8] and not argued separately. Therefore, we also
sustain the anticipation rejection of claims 16 through 19 for
the same reasons as claim 5.
In summary, we have affirmed the Examiner’s rejection of
claims 5 through 19 under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as being anticipated
by Toyokura.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
-7-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007