Appeal No. 97-0514
Application 08/345,114
of the specification, to the effect that the analyzer and
processor "may be physically separate or contained on the same
device," e.g., as "part of a single computer system, such as a
microprocessor system." As appellant states on page 6 of the
brief,
it should be clear from the Specification
that any processing unit in the analyzer is
different from the processor [as disclosed
and claimed], which is used to process the
measurement made by the analyzer.
We therefore conclude that claims 1 to 27 are in
compliance with the second paragraph of § 112, and will not
sustain rejection (1).
Rejections (2) and (3)
These rejections will be considered together, since
each involves the same issue; namely, the scope of the term
"radiation." Also, the rejected claims will all stand or fall
together, as appellant has not given any explanation as to why
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007